I have been using the Seafile Client for Windows since years now. I have always made sure that my Client has about the space of my library so that I can sync all my stuff.
As SeaDrive was introduced I was very unimpressed, as I dont need this for my situation.
But as time passes by and nothing really seams to happen to the normal seafile client, I start questioning my self a few things:
-
Is the DriveClient the future of Seafile Client / is it the devs-focus in future?
-
Do developers even recommend this over the classic client and will eventually let the old client die?
-
Can the Seadrive Client let me still have my data on D:\Videos , D:\Musik, D:\ Documents or must in all be in this sort-of Network-Drive (S:) - > meaning that I don’t really now where my Data is. because its cached somewhere in behind?
-
Can I install both in parallel, without have the Data being doubled on my local OS. If yes, how?
-
Why didn’t you just implement “selective”-sync (like: oneDrive / Dropbox) into that normal Client, and let people decide what the want fully locally and what they want only the place holders to be displayed?
I really feel sorry for the old Client cause its just feels something left behind…
- still need to go into the webinterface if I want to make a external Link with a password a expiration time… or just show created links…
The Selective folders e.g. this behavior like from OneDrive would have really ****** well fit to the normal Client:
PS:
Just wanted to add, that I’m am thankfull for getting a good product where I can put my Data in my location and not have at MS or Google or what ever. AND I know how much it costs to develop software, I’m just kinda frustrated with some things